4.7 Article

Body condition and pregnancy in northern Yellowstone elk: Evidence for predation risk effects?

Journal

ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 3-8

Publisher

ECOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1890/09-2123.1

Keywords

Canis lupus; Cervus elaphus; condition; elk; nutrition; predation; pregnancy; wolves; Yellowstone

Funding

  1. Biological Resources Discipline of the United States Geological Survey
  2. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks
  3. National Geographic Society
  4. National Park Service
  5. National Science Foundation [DEB-078130, DEB-0716188]
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  7. Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
  8. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
  9. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
  10. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
  11. U.S. Geological Survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

S. Creel et al. reported a negative correlation between fecal progesterone concentrations and elk : wolf ratios in greater Yellowstone elk (Cervus elaphus) herds and interpreted this correlation as evidence that pregnancy rates of elk decreased substantially in the presence of wolves (Canis lupus). Apparently, the hypothesized mechanism is that decreased forage intake reduces body condition and either results in elk failing to conceive during the autumn rut or elk losing the fetus during winter. We tested this hypothesis by comparing age-specific body condition (percentage ingesta-free body fat) and pregnancy rates for northern Yellowstone elk, one of the herds sampled by Creel et al., before (1962-1968) and after (2000-2006) wolf restoration using indices developed and calibrated for Rocky Mountain elk. Mean age-adjusted percentage body fat of female elk was similarly high in both periods (9.0% +/- 0.9% pre-wolf; 8.9% +/- 0.8% post-wolf). Estimated pregnancy rates (proportion of females that were pregnant) were 0.91 pre-wolf and 0.87 post-wolf for 4-9 year-old elk (95% CI on difference = -0.15 to 0.03, P = 0.46) and 0.64 pre-wolf and 0.78 post-wolf for elk >9 years old (95% CI on difference = -0.01 to 0.27, P = 0.06). Thus, there was little evidence in these data to support strong effects of wolf presence on elk pregnancy. We caution that multiple lines of evidence and/or strong validation should be brought to bear before relying on indirect measures of how predators affect pregnancy rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available