4.7 Article

Managing resistance to Bt crops in a genetically variable insect herbivore, Ostrinia nubilalis

Journal

ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1228-1236

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/09-0067.1

Keywords

Bacillus thuringensis; Bt corn; Bt cotton; European corn borer, ECB; genetically modified organism; high-dose/refuge strategy; insect-resistance management, IRM; integrated pest management, IPM; Ostrinia nubilalis; pheromone races; stable carbon isotopes

Funding

  1. NSF
  2. Cornell University Center for the Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To slow the resistance evolution of the European corn borer (ECB) to Cry proteins expressed in transgenic Bacillus thuringensis (Bt) corn, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has adopted an insect resistance management (IRM) plan that relies on a high dose/refuge strategy. However, this IRM plan does not consider possible ecological differences between the two ECB pheromone races (E and Z). Using carbon isotope analysis, we found that unstructured (non-corn) refuges contribute more to E race (18%) than to Z race (4%) populations of ECB in upstate New York (USA). Furthermore, feeding on non-corn hosts is associated with decreased body mass and reduced fecundity. We also show that the geographic range of E-race ECB is restricted within the range of the Z race and that E-race ECB are increasingly dominant in regions with increasing non-corn habitat. While the proportion of E-race ECB developing in unstructured refuges is higher than previously assumed, low rates of unstructured refuge use by the Z race, evidence for reduced fecundity when reared on non-corn hosts, and complete sympatry within the E race range all argue against a relaxation of current IRM refuge standards in corn based on alternative-host use. We also discuss implications of this research for integrated pest management in vegetables and IRM in Bt cotton.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available