4.6 Article

Dynamics of Electron Recombination and Transport in Water-Splitting Dye-Sensitized Photoanodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 119, Issue 24, Pages 13858-13867

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01442

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Energy Biosciences, Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07ER15911]
  2. National Science Foundation [DGE1255832]
  3. Pennsylvania State University Materials Research Institute Nanofabrication Laboratory under National Science Foundation [ECS-0335765]
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  5. Division Of Graduate Education [0947962] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water-splitting dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cells (WS-DSPECs) use visible light to split water using molecular sensitizers and water oxidation catalysts codeposited onto mesoporous TiO2 electrodes. Despite a high quantum yield of charge injection and low requirement for the catalytic turnover rate, the quantum yield of water splitting in WS-DSPECs is typically low (<1%). Here we examine the charge separation and recombination processes in WS-DSPECs photoanodes functionalized with varying amounts of IrO2 nanoparticle catalyst. Charge extraction and transient open-circuit voltage decay measurements provide insight into the relationship between light intensity, conduction band electron density, open-circuit photovoltage, and recombination time scale. We correlate these results with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and present the first complete equivalent circuit model for a WS-DSPEC. The data show quantitatively that recombination of photoinjected electrons with oxidized sensitizer molecules and scavenging by the water oxidation catalyst limit the concentration of conduction band electrons and by extension the photo current of WS-DSPECs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available