4.3 Article

Examining Landscape Factors Influencing Relative Distribution of Mosquito Genera and Frequency of Virus Infection

Journal

ECOHEALTH
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 239-249

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10393-009-0260-y

Keywords

tropical rainforest; anthropogenic habitat change; flavivirus; bunyavirus; coronavirus; rhabdovirus

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts
  2. Robert Koch-Institute
  3. National Institutes of Health [GM070077, AI57158]
  4. NafoG (Nachwuchsforderungsgesellschaft)
  5. Aventis Ilab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mosquito-borne infections cause some of the most debilitating human diseases, including yellow fever and malaria, yet we lack an understanding of how disease risk scales with human-driven habitat changes. We present an approach to study variation in mosquito distribution and concomitant viral infections on the landscape level. In a pilot study we analyzed mosquito distribution along a 10-km transect of a West African rainforest area, which included primary forest, secondary forest, plantations, and human settlements. Variation was observed in the abundance of Anopheles, Aedes, Culex, and Uranotaenia mosquitoes between the different habitat types. Screening of trapped mosquitoes from the different habitats led to the isolation of five uncharacterized viruses of the families Bunyaviridae, Coronaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Rhabdoviridae, as well as an unclassified virus. Polymerase chain reaction screening for these five viruses in individual mosquitoes indicated a trend toward infection with specific viruses in specific mosquito genera that differed by habitat. Based on these initial analyses, we believe that further work is indicated to investigate the impact of anthropogenic landscape changes on mosquito distribution and accompanying arbovirus infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available