4.7 Review

Using dynamic vegetation models to simulate plant range shifts

Journal

ECOGRAPHY
Volume 37, Issue 12, Pages 1184-1197

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.00580

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Council for Independent Research - Natural Sciences [10-085056]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [SNF 315200-122434]
  3. COST section of the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation [SBF C07.0123]
  4. Marie Curie IEF [FORECOFUN-SSA PIEF-GA-2010-274798]
  5. [CONICYT-PAI-82130046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic vegetation models (DVMs) follow a process-based approach to simulate plant population demography, and have been used to address questions about disturbances, plant succession, community composition, and provisioning of ecosystem services under climate change scenarios. Despite their potential, they have seldom been used for studying species range dynamics explicitly. In this perspective paper, we make the case that DVMs should be used to this end and can improve our understanding of the factors that influence species range expansions and contractions. We review the benefits of using process-based, dynamic models, emphasizing how DVMs can be applied specifically to questions about species range dynamics. Subsequently, we provide a critical evaluation of some of the limitations and trade-offs associated with DVMs, and we use those to guide our discussions about future model development. This includes a discussion on which processes are lacking, specifically a mechanistic representation of dispersal, inclusion of the seedling stage, trait variability, and a dynamic representation of reproduction. We also discuss upscaling techniques that offer promising solutions for being able to run these models efficiently over large spatial extents. Our aim is to provide directions for future research efforts and to illustrate the value of the DVM approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available