4.7 Article

paleobioDB: an R package for downloading, visualizing and processing data from the Paleobiology Database

Journal

ECOGRAPHY
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 419-425

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.01154

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Education for Competitiveness Operational Programme (ECOP) project 'Support of establishment, development and mobility of quality research teams at the Charles Univ.' [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0022]
  2. European Science Foundation
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation EAR Geoinformatics grant [0949416]
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [0949416] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fossil record acts as a time machine, providing data on the morphology, ecology and biogeography of ancient species. Therefore, ideally, fossil data should be included in evolutionary, macroecological and biogeographical studies. However, paleontological data are often not used in biological research, in part because of the difficulty of extracting occurrence records from the primary literature. The goal of the Paleobiology Database is to make these records generally accessible, but unlike databases such as Genbank and GBIF, a ready-made interface to the R computing environment has not been available. We have developed paleobioDB, an R package designed to perform easy and flexible queries of the Paleobiology Database, including visualization, downloading and processing of selected data. This package facilitates access to paleontological data in a way that should allow further analysis using other packages and libraries available in R. The paleobioDB package should facilitate the integration of paleontological and neontological datasets, so that data from the deep past can be used to help inform our understanding of living biota, and vice versa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available