Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A Framework to Optimize Biodiversity Restoration Efforts Based on Habitat Amount and Landscape Connectivity
Leandro R. Tambosi et al.
RESTORATION ECOLOGY (2014)
Evaluating the effectiveness of a Safe Harbor Program for connecting wildlife populations
A. M. Trainor et al.
ANIMAL CONSERVATION (2013)
Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures
Bronwyn Rayfield et al.
ECOLOGY (2011)
Identifying critical regions in small-world marine metapopulations
James R. Watson et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2011)
Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments
Orjan Bodin et al.
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING (2010)
Metapopulation mean life time within complex networks
S. Kininmonth et al.
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES (2010)
Assessing replacement cost of conservation areas: How does habitat loss influence priorities?
Atte Moilanen et al.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION (2009)
Using connectivity metrics in conservation planning - when does habitat quality matter?
Piero Visconti et al.
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS (2009)
Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity
Santiago Saura et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE (2009)
Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity
Ernesto Estrada et al.
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS (2008)
Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network
Robert S. Schick et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2007)
A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study
Santiago Saura et al.
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING (2007)
Conservation planning in a changing world
Robert L. Pressey et al.
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2007)
A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape
Orjan Bodin et al.
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY (2007)
Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation
Lucia Pascual-Hortal et al.
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY (2006)
Working backwards to move forwards: Graph-based connectivity metrics for reserve network selection
KD Rothley et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT (2005)
Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection
M Drechsler
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION (2005)
Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design
M Cabeza et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2004)
Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world?
E Meir et al.
ECOLOGY LETTERS (2004)
Site-selection algorithms and habitat loss
M Cabeza et al.
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2003)
How much does an individual habitat fragment contribute to metapopulation dynamics and persistence?
O Ovaskainen et al.
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY (2003)
Landscape patterns simulation with a modified random clusters method
S Saura et al.
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY (2000)
Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals
GD Sutherland et al.
CONSERVATION ECOLOGY (2000)
The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape
I Hanski et al.
NATURE (2000)
Share Paper
