4.6 Article

Graphene Nanomesh Formation by Fluorine Intercalation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 119, Issue 52, Pages 29193-29200

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10582

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation [NRF-NRFF2013-07]
  2. Singapore National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office under medium-sized centre program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene nanomeshes are mainly produced through top-down lithography, resulting in unavoidable defects or contamination. In this article, we demonstrate a bottom-up approach through partial intercalation of fluorine between the carbon buffer layer and the underlying SiC(0001) substrate by low-temperature annealing of a deposited molecular layer of fluorinated fullerenes C60F48. Due to the inherent periodicity of the bonding between the buffer layer and the underlying SiC(0001) substrate, selective fluorination and partial intercalation take place. Using scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy as well as density functional theory calculations, the existence of a graphene nanomesh with the local atomic arrangement of a graphene sheet and surface corrugation of long-range periodicity is revealed. Surprisingly, the nanomesh exhibits electronically an intermediate state between the conventional buffer layer and quasi-free-standing graphene. Specifically, unlike the buffer layer, which is bonded covalently to the SiC(0001) surface so that the characteristic graphene pi-network about the K point of the Brilluoin zone is destroyed, this intermediate state retains the wave function characteristics of graphene, but a two-peak structure in the local density of states (LDOS) is introduced about the K point. This graphene nanomesh with a two-peak LDOS structure about the K point presents another playground for the study of transport properties in supported two-dimensional materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available