4.6 Article

Seismic behavior and strength capacity of steel tube-reinforced concrete composite columns

Journal

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 487-505

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2354

Keywords

axial force ratio; transverse reinforcement; seismic behavior; strength; deformation capacity; steel tube-reinforced concrete (ST-RC) composite column

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51261120377, 51008173]
  2. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [2012THZ02-1, 2011THZ03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The steel tube-reinforced concrete (ST-RC) composite column is a novel type of composite column, which consists of a steel tube embedded in RC. In this paper, the seismic behavior of ST-RC columns is examined through a series of experiments in which 10 one-third scale column specimens were subjected to axial forces and lateral cyclic loading. The test variables include the axial force ratio applied to the columns and the amount of transverse reinforcement. All specimens failed in a flexural mode, showing stable hysteresis loops. Thanks to the steel tube and the high-strength concrete it is filled with, the ST-RC column specimens had approximately 30% lower axial force ratios and 22% higher maximum bending moments relative to the comparable RC columns when subjected to identical axial compressive loads. The amount of transverse reinforcement made only a small difference to the lateral load-carrying capacity but significantly affected the deformation and energy dissipation capacity of the ST-RC columns. The specimens that satisfied the requirements for transverse reinforcement adopted for medium ductile RC columns as specified by the Chinese Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (GB 50011-2010) and EuroCode 8 achieved an ultimate drift ratio of around 0.03 and a displacement ductility ratio of approximately 5. The design formulas used to evaluate the strength capacity of the ST-RC columns were developed on the basis of the superposition method. The predictions from the formulas showed good agreement with the test results, with errors no greater than 10%. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available