4.6 Article

A macro-element model for non-linear soil-shallow foundation-structure interaction under seismic loads: theoretical development and experimental validation on large scale tests

Journal

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 475-493

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1140

Keywords

dynamic soil-structure interaction under seismic loads; non-linear macro-element; shallow foundations; large-scale experiments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, different formulations of a macro-element model for non-linear dynamic soil-structure interaction analyses of structures lying on shallow foundations are first reviewed, and secondly, a novel formulation is introduced, which combines some of the characteristics of previous approaches with several additional features. This macro-element allows one to model soil-footing geometric (uplift) and material (soil plasticity) non-linearities that are coupled through a stiffness degradation model. Footing uplift is introduced by a simple non-linear elastic model based on the concept of effective foundation width, whereas soil plasticity is treated by means of a bounding surface approach in which a vertical load mapping rule is implemented. This mapping is particularly suited for the seismic loading case for which the proposed model has been conceived. The new macro-element is subsequently validated using cyclic and dynamic large-scale laboratory tests of shallow foundations on dense sand, namely: the TRISEE cyclic tests, the Public Works Research Institute and CAMUS IV shaking table tests. Based on this comprehensive validation process against a set of independent experimental results, a unique set of macro-element parameters for shallow foundations on dense sand is proposed, which can be used to perform predictive analyses by means of the present model. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available