4.6 Article

Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD

Journal

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 41-60

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1117

Keywords

seismic protection; Tuned Mass Damper (TMD); large mass ratio; High-Damping Rubber Bearings (HDRB); optimal design; shaking table tests

Funding

  1. Sapienza Universita di Roma [2009/C26A09J3TL]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the dynamic behavior and the seismic effectiveness of a non-conventional Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) with large mass ratio. Compared with conventional TMD, the device mass is increased up to be comparable with the mass of the structure to be protected, aiming at a better control performance. In order to avoid the introduction of an excessive additional weight, masses already present on the structure are converted into tuned masses, retaining structural or architectural functions beyond the mere control function. A reduced order model is introduced for design purposes and the optimal design of a large mass ratio TMD for seismic applications is then formulated. The design method is specifically developed to implement High-Damping Rubber Bearings (HDRB) to connect the device mass to the main structure, taking advantage of combining stiffness and noticeable damping characteristics. Ground acceleration is modeled as a Gaussian random process with white noise power spectral density. A numerical searching technique is used to obtain the optimal design parameter, the frequency ratio alpha, which minimizes the root-mean-square displacement response of the main structure. The study finally comprises shaking table tests on a 1:5 scale model under a wide selection of accelerograms, both artificial and natural, to assess the seismic effectiveness of the proposed large mass ratio TMD. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available