4.5 Article

Cosmogenic nuclide-derived rates of diffusive and episodic erosion in the glacially sculpted upper Rhone Valley, Swiss Alps

Journal

EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 651-662

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1961

Keywords

central Swiss Alps; cosmogenic Be-10; denudation rates

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Denudation rates of small tributary valleys in the upper Rhone valley of the Swiss Central Alps vary by more than an order of magnitude within a very small distance (tens of kilometers). Morphometric data indicate two distinct erosion processes operate in these steep mountain valleys. We determined the rates of these processes using cosmogenic beryllium-10 (Be-10) in pooled soil and stream sediment samples. Denudation in deep, glacially scoured valleys is characterized by rapid, non-uniform processes, such as debris flows and rock falls. In these steep valleys denudation rates are 760-2100 mm kyr(-1). In those basins which show minimal previous glacial modification denudation rates are low with 60-560 mm kyr(-1). The denudation rate in each basin represents a binary mixture between the rapid, non-uniform processes, and soil creep. The soil production rate measured with cosmogenic Be-10 in soil samples averages at 60 mm kyr(-1). Mixing calculations suggest that the debris flows and rock falls are occurring at rates up to 3000-7000 mm kyr(-1). These very high rates occur in the absence of baselevel lowering, since the tributaries drain into the Rhone trunk stream up-stream of a knickzone. The flux-weighted spatial average of denudation rates for the upper Rhone valley is 1400 mm kyr(-1), which is similar to rock uplift rates determined in this area from leveling. The pace and location of erosion processes are determined by the oscillation between a glacial and a non-glacial state, preventing the landscape from reaching equilibrium. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available