4.2 Article

The Ancient Blue Oak Woodlands of California: Longevity and Hydroclimatic History

Journal

EARTH INTERACTIONS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1175/2013EI000518.1

Keywords

Ancient blue oak woodland; Quercus douglasii; Tree-ring analysis; Winter precipitation; Atmospheric rivers; San Francisco Bay salinity

Funding

  1. CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program [ERP02-P30]
  2. National Science Foundation [ATM-0753399]
  3. U.S. Geological Survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ancient blue oak trees are still widespread across the foothills of the Coast Ranges, Cascades, and Sierra Nevada in California. The most extensive tracts of intact old-growth blue oak woodland appear to survive on rugged and remote terrain in the southern Coast Ranges and on the foothills west and southwest of Mt. Lassen. In the authors' sampling of old-growth stands, most blue oak appear to have recruited to the canopy in the middle to late nineteenth century. The oldest living blue oak tree sampled was over 459 years old, and several dead blue oak logs had over 500 annual rings. Precipitation sensitive tree-ring chronologies up to 700 years long have been developed from old blue oak trees and logs. Annual ring-width chronologies of blue oak are strongly correlated with cool season precipitation totals, streamflow in the major rivers of California, and the estuarine water quality of San Francisco Bay. A new network of 36 blue oak chronologies records spatial anomalies in growth that arise from latitudinal changes in the mean storm track and location of land-falling atmospheric rivers. These long, climate-sensitive blue oak chronologies have been used to reconstruct hydroclimatic history in California and will help to better understand and manage water resources. The environmental history embedded in blue oak growth chronologies may help justify efforts to conserve these authentic old-growth native woodlands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available