4.7 Article

Identification of the subsurface sulfide bodies responsible for acidity in Rio Tinto source water, Spain

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 391, Issue -, Pages 36-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.022

Keywords

geophysical exploration; hidden sulfide bodies; natural acidic water system

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-2009-AdG-250350]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The acidic waters of the Rio Tinto rise from several acidic springs that emerge in the area surrounding Pena de Hierro (Fernandez-Remolar et al., 2005). These springs are located above minor normal faults that act as natural conduits for the water from the underlying deep aquifer. Although it has been suggested that the acidity of the river originates from the biooxidation of massive and stockwork sulfides (Fernandez-Remolar et al., 2008a), the location of the source for these acidic solutions has not previously been established. This lack of evidence has been used to suggest that the acidity of the Rio Tinto may be the product of the most conspicuous of the possible source, the extensive mining of the area over approximately the last 5000 years (Davis et al., 2000). In this paper, we report resistivity and time-domain electromagnetic sounding data from the Rio Tinto aquifer to a depth of similar to 600 m, revealing the locations for the acidic sources. Both types of data support the presence of two distinct geological units that we interpret as thrust sheets emplaced onto each other during the Variscan orogeny of the Carboniferous. These units, both of which contain massive and stockwork sulfides, act as the aquifer for the acidic waters of the Rio Tinto. Under this scenario, which is in agreement with the geological record of the Rio Tinto fluvial system for the past 6 Ma (Moreno et al., 2003), our results imply that mining activity had little influence on the generation of the acidic river waters. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available