4.7 Article

The geomagnetic dipole moment variation between 250 and 800 ka BP reconstructed from the authigenic 10Be/9Be signature in West Equatorial Pacific sediments

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 385, Issue -, Pages 190-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.037

Keywords

marine sediment geochemistry; Be-10 cosmogenic production; geomagnetic dipole moment; Brunhes paleomagnetic excursions; Brunhes/Matuyama transition

Funding

  1. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-BLAN-0053-01]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-BLAN-0053] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authigenic Be-10/Be-9 ratio, proxy of the cosmogenic radionuclide Be-10 production rate in the atmosphere, was measured in sediments deposited in the West Equatorial Pacific (Gulf of Papua; 10 degrees 25 S; 146 degrees 15 E), in order to reconstruct the geomagnetic dipole moment variations in the 250-800 ka time interval, independently from paleomagnetic methods. The pelagic clayey-carbonate muds continuously deposited between marine isotope stages 8 and 20 were subsampled every 10 cm. The Be-10 production rate record reconstructed for the 250-800 ka interval is described and compared over the same time interval with global paleomagnetic stacks (SINT-2000 and PISO-1500). The highlighted cosmogenic Be-10 overproductions appear to be triggered by the series of Geomagnetic Dipole Lows (GDL) that have occurred since the Brunhes-Matuyama reversal. Calibration using absolute values of the geomagnetic dipole moment drawn from a paleomagnetic database produces a new record of the dipole moment variations over the 250-800 ka time interval. The timing and amplitude of the GDL succession revealed by such records will contribute to improving knowledge of the geodynamo rhythms and rate of changes at millennial to million year scales. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available