4.7 Article

Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd garnet geochronology: Chronometric closure and implications for dating petrological processes

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 381, Issue -, Pages 222-233

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.08.046

Keywords

Lu-Hf; Sm-Nd; garnet; geochronology; closure temperature; granulite

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) through a Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Award [SM 308/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the systematics of the Lu-176-Hf-176 and Sm-147-Nd-143 and garnet chronometers, we performed REE and isotope analyses on garnet crystals of different size (0.55-3.1 mm radius) from a single granulite specimen (Archean Pikwitonei Granulite Domain, Manitoba, Canada). The Lu-Hf dates are similar among grains having radii larger than 1.3 mm (weighted mean: 2714 +/- 6 Ma; 2 s.d.) and up to 20 Myr younger for finer fractions. In contrast, Sm-Nd dates are equal to or younger than the 2641-2637 Ma age of peak metamorphism. The roles of concurrently digested inclusions and core-rim Lu/Sm fractionation are quantitatively evaluated and excluded as causes for the observed age heterogeneity. Instead, the isotope dates are interpreted to reflect partial loss of radiogenic Hf-176 and Nd-143, and are used to constrain the systematics of the garnet chronometers at high temperature. The data constrain the grain sizes and thermal histories for which garnet dates can be validly linked to prograde or peak P-T conditions. In addition, garnet dates can now be used to place quantitative constraints on initial cooling from high- and ultrahigh temperature a temperature segment that is inaccessible to other thermochronometers. The results indicate that garnet could play a major role in governing Hf-176/Hf-177 disequilibria and decoupling of Hf-176/Hf-177 from Nd-143/Nd-144 at a mineral scale in much of the mid- to lower crust and lithospheric mantle. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available