4.7 Article

Wind as the primary driver of erosion in the Qaidam Basin, China

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 374, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.03.011

Keywords

wind; cosmogenic nuclide-dating; earth surface processes; Chinese Loess Plateau; climate; Asia

Funding

  1. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [48729-ND8]
  2. DFG-Leibniz Center for Surface Processes and Climate Studies at the Universitat Potsdam, Germany
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1203973] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deserts are a major source of loess and may undergo substantial wind-erosion as evidenced by yardang fields, deflation pans, and wind-scoured bedrock landscapes. However, there are few quantitative estimates of bedrock removal by wind abrasion and deflation. Here, we report wind-erosion rates in the western Qaidam Basin in central China based on measurements of cosmogenic Be-10 in exhumed Miocene sedimentary bedrock. Sedimentary bedrock erosion rates range from 0.05 to 0.4 mm/yr, although the majority of measurements cluster at 0.125 +/- 0.05 mm/yr. These results, combined with previous work, indicate that strong winds, hyper-aridity, exposure of friable Neogene strata, and ongoing rock deformation and uplift in the western Qaidam Basin have created an environment where wind, instead of water, is the dominant agent of erosion and sediment transport. Its geographic location (upwind) combined with volumetric estimates suggest that the Qaidam Basin is a major source (up to 50%) of dust to the Chinese Loess Plateau to the east. The cosmogenically derived wind erosion rates are within the range of erosion rates determined from glacial and fluvial dominated landscapes worldwide, exemplifying the effectiveness of wind to erode and transport significant quantities of bedrock. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available