Journal
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 335, Issue -, Pages 154-166Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.04.015
Keywords
pseudotachylyte; overpressure; gouge; injection veins; dynamic weakening; thermal pressurization
Categories
Funding
- NSF MARGINS [0840977]
- NSF EAR [0948740]
- Division Of Earth Sciences
- Directorate For Geosciences [0948740] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Division Of Ocean Sciences
- Directorate For Geosciences [0840977] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Fault rocks such as pseudotachylyte melt or granular gouge are sometimes injected into cracks off a fault surface. The width to height ratio of the injection veins is a direct measure of the shear strain in the wall rock required to accommodate the injection, so the aspect ratios preserve a record of the overpressure opening the cracks and injecting melt or fluidized granular material from the fault zone. We measured the aspect ratios for 201 pseudotachylyte injections and 29 granular injections. They have aspect ratios of similar to 0.2 (0.17 +/- 0.025 and 0.22 +/- 0.077, respectively, within 99% confidence). These are significantly proportionally wider than the aspect ratios of ordinary dikes (from 10(-4) to 10(-3)). The injection aspect ratios exceed the usual limit of elastic strain in the wallrock (similar to 1%) so we infer that the injection veins were accommodated by permanent deformation by microcracking and slip on foliation surfaces in the host rock, which is difficult to detect observationally. The fully elastic model therefore offers an upper bound on the stress required to open these injection veins (similar to 10(8)-10(10) Pa, with higher pressures in stiffer host rock lithologies.) These overpressures cannot be achieved by expansion of the fault rock fluids during melting or gouge fluidization mechanisms, as the pressure along the fault is limited to 107 Pa by the wall rock compliance. Dynamic tension parallel to the fault is required to explain the large apparent overpressures in the injection veins. Therefore, both pseudotachylyte and gouge injections of this aspect ratio must be considered seismic signatures. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available