4.7 Article

Heat production and geotherms for the continental lithosphere

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 307, Issue 1-2, Pages 59-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.034

Keywords

continental lithosphere; heat generation; geotherm; xenolith thermobarometry; craton

Funding

  1. Department of Geology and Geophysics at the University of Utah

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a continental lithosphere heat production model based on the petrology of crust and mantle, heat production measurements of surface and xenolith samples, and tectono-thermal constraints. Continental elevation considered within a thermal isostasy rubric is used to partition crustal heat production into upper crustal and lower crustal contributions. The best-fitting partition model using elevation data from 33 North American tectonic provinces suggests upper crustal heat production on average accounts for similar to 6% of observed surface heat flow. An average heat production for the lower crust of 0.4 mu W/m(3) is based on measurements from exposed granulite terranes while a lithospheric mantle heat production of 0.02 mu W/m(3) is based on chemical analyses of mantle xenoliths. Results are relatively insensitive to mantle composition and thickness of the upper crustal heat producing layer. Continental geotherms are computed using the generalized heat production model and incorporating thermal conductivity results from a number of recent laboratory studies. P-T conditions of xenoliths provide further constraints to ensure that our geotherms and hence the heat production model are reasonable. P-T conditions of 10 Precambrian regions are consistent with surface heat flow of 40 mW/m(2) and a lithospheric thickness of 200 km. Our generalized model for heat production can serve as a reference model from which anomalies are identified. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available