4.7 Article

Cenozoic deep crust in the Pamir

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 312, Issue 3-4, Pages 411-421

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.10.034

Keywords

Pamir; metamorphic petrology; geochronology; exhumation; crustal recycling

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [bundle 443, Ra442/34]
  2. US National Science Foundation [EAR-0838269]
  3. Division of Earth Sciences, National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [0838269] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple high-grade crystalline domes across the Pamir contain Barrovian facies-series metapelites with peak metamorphic assemblages of garnet + kyanite +/- staurolite + biotite + oligoclase +/- K-white mica. Thermobarometry yields pressures of 6.5-8.2 kbar and temperatures of 600-650 degrees C for the Kurgovat dome in the northwestern Pamir, 9.4 kbar and 588 degrees C for the west-central Yazgulom dome, 9.1-11.7 kbar and 700-800 degrees C for the east-central Muskol dome, and 6.5-14.6 kbar and 700-800 degrees C for the giant Shakhdara dome in the southwestern Pamir. These new data indicate exhumation of the Pamir crystalline domes from crustal depths of similar to 30-40 km. New titanite, monazite and zircon geochronology, in conjunction with published ages, illustrate that this metamorphism is Oligocene-Miocene in all but the Kurgovat dome (where it is Triassic). If the Pamir had a pre-collisional crustal thickness less than 30 km and if the India-Asia convergence within the Pamir is less than 600 km, the current 70 km-thick crust could have been created by plane strain with no net gain or loss of material. Alternatively, if the pre-collisional crustal thickness was greater than 30 km or India-Asia convergence within the Pamir is more than 600 km, significant loss of continental crust must have occurred by subhorizontal extrusion, erosion, or recycling into the mantle. Crustal recycling is the most likely, based on deep seismicity and Miocene deep crustal xenoliths. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available