4.7 Article

Axial melt lenses at oceanic ridges - A case study in the Oman ophiolite

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 304, Issue 3-4, Pages 313-325

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.01.029

Keywords

oceanic ridge; melt lens; magma chamber; Oman ophiolite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Oman ophiolite, a fossil fast-spreading oceanic ridge had a melt lens perched on top of the magma chamber wherein the gabbro unit was crystallizing. In ophiolites, this melt lens is reduced to a horizon that has been identified in the field. The gabbros that subsided from the lens horizon and drifted out of the magma chamber, while developing a steep magmatic foliation, provide insights into the active melt lens processes. A gabbro, sampled right below the horizon where the lens closed, has virtually not subsided and it offers a direct glance at the floor of the lens. Below, the deeper the gabbros are sampled, the more they have subsided before drifting out of the magma chamber, and the closer they derive from the center of the lens floor. Cross sections in these gabbros record successive events occurring within the lens. In particular, anorthosite layers and lenses that are interlayered within the foliated gabbros record the intrusion of a new melt where plagioclase is the first mineral to crystallize on liquidus. Detailed mapping of anorthosite swarms suggest that melt intrusions are massive, lasting less than 4 yr and that their frequency is similar to 100 yr. Their large volume controls the stability of melt lenses. A new melt surge induces rapid and large inflation of the lens. Melt lens deflation follows, that is due to the ongoing process of crustal accretion both in the gabbro unit by continuous subsidence of a thick gabbroic mush from the lens floor, and in the lid above the lens roof by sheeted dike intrusions feeding basalt extrusions at the higher frequency of similar to 10 yr. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available