4.7 Article

The composition of the incipient partial melt of garnet peridotite at 3 GPa and the origin of OIB

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 308, Issue 3-4, Pages 380-390

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.06.008

Keywords

experimental petrology; ocean island basalt; partial melting; garnet peridotite

Funding

  1. NSF [EAR0609967, EAR1019744]
  2. Division Of Earth Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1019744] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We determined experimentally the composition of an incipient partial melt of a garnet Iherzolite similar to KLB-1 peridotite at 3 GPa using modified iterative sandwich experiments (MISE). The MISE method enables microbeam analyses of quenched liquids that are in equilibrium at the onset of melting (nominally, 0% melt fraction) with a specified peridotite bulk composition. The equilibrium incipient partial melt is a TiO2-enriched (2.5 +/- 0.2 wt.%) alkali olivine basalt with 44.8 +/- 0.2 wt.% SiO2 and 15.8 +/- 0.1 wt% MgO. Therefore, it has some compositional characteristics similar to a plausible parent to many alkalic oceanic island basalts. But in detail, several key components of this melt are different from parental liquids of typical primitive alkalic OIB, including lower FeO* (9.7 +/- 0.1 wt.%) and higher Al2O3 (12.7 +/- 0.2 wt.%). It is also distinct from basalts derived from the EM and HIMU mantle end-members. We conclude that the vast majority of alkalic OIB cannot originate from volatile-poor partial melting of garnet peridotite at the base of the oceanic lithosphere unless there are contributions from non-peridotitic lithologies and/or enrichment in volatiles, iron, or other metasomatic components, and that such lithologic heterogeneities are intrinsic features of the HIMU and EM mantle reservoirs. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available