4.7 Article

Chondrites as samples of differentiated planetesimals

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 305, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.03.010

Keywords

Chondrite; planetesimal; magma ocean; differentiation; Allende

Funding

  1. NSF
  2. NASA
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0747154] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chondritic meteorites are unmelted and variably metamorphosed aggregates of the earliest solids of the solar system. The variety of metamorphic textures in chondrites motivated the onion shell model in which chondrites originated at varying depths within a parent body heated primarily by the short-lived radioisotope Al-26, with the highest metamorphic grade originating nearest the center. Allende and a few other chondrites possess a unidirectional magnetization that can be best explained by a core dynamo on their parent body, indicating internal melting and differentiation. Here we show that a parent body that accreted to >-200 km in radius by similar to 1.5 Ma after the formation of calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) would have a differentiated interior, and ongoing accretion would add a solid undifferentiated crust overlying a differentiated interior, consistent with formational and evolutionary constraints inferred for the CV parent body. This body could have produced a magnetic field lasting more than 10 Ma. This hypothesis represents a new model for the origin of some chondrites, presenting them as the unprocessed crusts of internally differentiated early planetesimals. Such bodies may exist in the asteroid belt today; the shapes and masses of the two largest asteroids, 1 Ceres and 2 Pallas, can be consistent with differentiated interiors, conceivably with small iron cores with hydrated silicate or ice-silicate mantles, covered with undifferentiated crusts. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available