4.7 Article

Constraints on Hadean geodynamics from mineral inclusions in >4 Ga zircons

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 298, Issue 3-4, Pages 367-376

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.08.010

Keywords

zircon; Hadean; inclusion; thermobarometry; U-Pb; Jack Hills

Funding

  1. Division Of Earth Sciences
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [0948724] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inclusion mineralogy of 1450 zircons over 4 billion years in age from the Jack Hills, Western Australia. was characterized for composition and phase assemblage. Results confirm that the inclusion population of these largely igneous zircons is dominated by muscovite and quartz (-75%). If the inclusions are original to the igneous zircons, this observation alone restricts the host melts to formation at pressure-temperature (P-T) conditions of -650-800 degrees C and >4 kbar. Several lines of evidence support the view that most of the analyzed mineral inclusions are primary, including their lack of association with cracks, magmatic crystal forms, and lack of exchange with fuchsitic (Cr-rich) micas in the host conglomerate. The application of T-1-in-zircon thermometry, and phengite,T-1-in-quartz, and Al-in-hornblende barometry to these inclusion assemblages yields estimates of magmatic P-T conditions from 5 to > 12 kbar and 700 +/- 40 degrees C. These data indicate zircon formation along geotherms of <= 60 degrees C/km and imply conductive near-surface heat flow of <40 to 85 mW/m(2)-a range that is substantially lower than most estimates of global Hadean heat flow. Of the possible environments capable of generating melting under such locally low heat flow early in Earth history, underthrusting, possibly in a manner similar to modern convergent margins, appears most consistent with numerous ether geochemical constraints derived from investigation of Hadean zircons. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available