4.7 Article

A burial diagenesis origin for the Ediacaran Shuram-Wonoka carbon isotope anomaly

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 294, Issue 1-2, Pages 152-162

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.03.022

Keywords

Neoproterozoic; carbon isotopes; strontium isotopes; oxygen isotopes; sulfur isotopes; diagenesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marked negative delta C-13 excursions in Ediacaran-age carbonate sediments have been identified in several sections globally, but are not recognized in all sections of similar age. The presence of delta(13)Ccarb values as low as -12% has been interpreted as recording fundamentally different processes in the global carbon cycle than those recognized today. The delta C-13(carb) anomalies are strongly correlated with delta(18)Ocarb values but are not represented in delta C-13(org) records. While no primary depositional processes have been identified that can produce the correlated delta O-18-delta C-13 arrays, simulations show that fluid-rock interaction with high-pCO(2) fluids is capable of producing such arrays at geologically reasonable pCO(2) and water-rock ratios. Variations in the Mg/Ca ratio and sulfate concentration of the altering fluid determine the extent of dolomite vs. calcite and anhydrite in the resulting mineral assemblage. Incorporation of an initially aragonitic mineralogy demonstrates that high Sr, low Mn/Sr and modest alteration of Sr-87/Sr-86 in ancient carbonates are all compatible with a burial diagenesis mechanism for generation of the delta C-13 anomalies, and do not necessarily imply preservation of primary values. The profound Ediacaran negative delta C-13 anomalies can be adequately explained by well-understood diagenetic processes, conflated with the difficulty of correlating Precambrian sections independently of chemostratigraphy. They are not a record of primary seawater variations and need not have independent stratigraphic significance. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available