4.7 Article

Conditions for Earth-like geodynamo models

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 296, Issue 3-4, Pages 487-496

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.009

Keywords

geomagnetic field; dynamo models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For many published dynamo models an Earth-like magnetic field has been claimed. However, it has also been noted that as the Ekman number (viscosity) is lowered to less unrealistic values, the magnetic field tends to become less Earth-like. Here we define quantitative criteria for the degree of semblance of a model field with the geomagnetic field, based on the field morphology at the core mantle boundary. We consider the ratio of the power in the axial dipole component to that in the rest if the field, the ratios between equatorially symmetric and antisymmetric and between zonal and non-zonal non-dipole components, and a measure for the degree of spatial concentration of magnetic flux at the core surface. We also briefly discuss shortcomings of possible other criteria for an Earth-like model. We test the compliance with our criteria for a large number of dynamo models driven by imposed temperatures at their inner and outer boundaries that cover the accessible parameter space. We order models according to their magnetic Reynolds number Rm (ratio of advection to diffusion of magnetic field) and magnetic Ekman number E-eta (ratio between rotation period and magnetic diffusion time). Requirements for an Earth-like field morphology are that E-eta<10(-4) and that Rm falls into a limited range that depends on E-eta. Higher values of Rm are required at low values of E-eta. Extrapolating the boundaries of compliant dynamos in this parameter space to the Earth's value of E-eta suggests that Earth-like dynamos exist all the way between present model values and parameter values of the geodynamo. We also study a more limited set of dynamo models with flux boundary conditions. The nature of the boundary condition and the distribution of sources and sinks of buoyancy have a secondary influence on the field morphology. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available