4.7 Article

Crustal intrusion beneath the Louisville hotspot track

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 289, Issue 3-4, Pages 323-333

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.11.020

Keywords

hotspots; Louisville Ridge; intrusion; crustal structure; gravity anomalies; flexure

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03G0195A]
  2. UK Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) [NE/F005318/1]
  3. NERC [NE/F005318/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F005318/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report here the first detailed 2D tomographic image of the crust and upper mantle structure of a Cretaceous seamount that formed during the interaction of the Pacific plate and the Louisville hotspot. Results show that at similar to 1.5 km beneath the seamount summit, the core of the volcanic edifice appears to be dominantly intrusive, with velocities faster than 6.5 km/s. The edifice overlies both high lower crustal (>7.2-7.6 km/s) and upper mantle (>8.3 km/s) velocities, suggesting that ultramafic rocks have been intruded as sills rather than underplated beneath the crust. The results suggest that the ratio between the volume of intra-crustal magmatic intrusion and extrusive volcanism is as high as similar to 4.5. In addition, the inversion of Moho reflections shows that the Pacific oceanic crust has been flexed downward by up to similar to 2.5 km beneath the seamount. The flexure can be explained by an elastic plate model in which the seamount emplaced upon oceanic lithosphere that was similar to 10 Myr at the time of loading. Intra-crustal magmatic intrusion may be a feature of hotspot volcanism at young, hot, oceanic lithosphere, whereas, magmatic underplating below a pre-existing Moho may be more likely to occur where a hotspot interacts with oceanic lithosphere that is several tens of millions of years old. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available