4.7 Article

Seismic anisotropy beneath Cascadia and the Mendocino triple junction: Interaction of the subducting slab with mantle flow

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 297, Issue 3-4, Pages 627-632

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.07.015

Keywords

Cascadia subduction; Mendocino Triple Junction; Gorda-Juan de Fuca plate; slab edge; shear wave splitting

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-0643392, EAR-0745934, EAR-0643077]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences [0847688, 0745934] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mantle flow associated with the Cascadia subduction zone and the Mendocino Triple Junction is poorly characterized due to a lack of shear wave splitting studies compared to other subduction zones. To fill this gap data was obtained from the Mendocino and FACES seismic networks that cover the region with dense station spacing. Over a period of 11-18 months, 50 suitable events were identified from which shear wave splitting parameters were calculated. Here we present stacked splitting results at 63 of the stations. The splitting pattern is uniform trench normal (N67 degrees E) throughout Cascadia with an average delay time of 1.25 s. This is consistent with subduction and our preferred interpretation is entrained mantle flow beneath the slab. The observed pattern and interpretation have implications for mantle dynamics that are unique to Cascadia compared to other subduction zones worldwide. The uniform splitting pattern seen throughout Cascadia ends at the triple junction where the fast directions rotate almost 90 degrees. Immediately south of the triple junction the fast direction rotates from NW-SE near the coast to NE-SW in northeastern California. This rotation beneath northern California is consistent with flow around the southern edge of the subducting Gorda slab. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available