4.7 Article

Stable calcium isotopic composition of meteorites and rocky planets

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 289, Issue 3-4, Pages 457-466

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.11.035

Keywords

formation of rocky planets; meteorites; Ca isotopes; non-equilibrium condensation; isotope fractionation

Funding

  1. NASA Astrobiology Institute [NAI02-0024-0006]
  2. NSF [EAR0408521]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New measurements of mass-dependent calcium isotope effects in meteorites, lunar and terrestrial samples show that Earth, Moon, Mars, and differentiated asteroids (e.g., 4-Vesta and the angrite and aubrite parent bodies) are indistinguishable from primitive ordinary chondritic meteorites at our current analytical resolution (+/-0.07 parts per thousand SD for the Ca-44/Ca-40 ratio). In contrast, enstatite chondritic meteorites are slightly enriched in heavier calcium isotopes (ca. +0.5 parts per thousand) and primitive carbonaceous chondritic meteorites are depleted in heavier calcium isotopes (ca. - 0.5 parts per thousand). The calcium isotope effects cannot be easily ascribed to evaporation or intraplanetary differentiation processes. The isotopic variations probably survive from the earliest stages of nebular condensation, and indicate that condensation occurred under non-equilibrium (undercooled nebular gas) conditions. Some of this early high-temperature calcium isotope heterogeneity is recorded by refractory inclusions (Niederer and Papanastassiou, 1984) and survived in planetesimals, but virtually none of it survived through terrestrial planet accretion. The new calcium isotope data suggest that ordinary chondrites are representative of the bulk of the refractory materials that formed the terrestrial planets; enstatite and carbonaceous chondrites are not. The enrichment of light calcium isotopes in bulk carbonaceous chondrites implies that their compositions are not fully representative of the solar nebula condensable fraction. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available