4.7 Article

Magneto-biostratigraphy of the Cicogna section (Italy): Implications for the late Paleocene-early Eocene time scale

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 285, Issue 1-2, Pages 39-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.05.033

Keywords

paleocene; eocene; magnetostratigraphy; biostratigraphy; magnetic properties; chronology

Funding

  1. MIUR-PRIN [2007W9B2WE_004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the magnetostratigraphy and calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the similar to 81 m thick upper Paleocene-lower Eocene Cicogna section from the Belluno Basin of NE Italy. The Cicogna section extends in stratigraphic continuity from Chron C25r to Chron C23r and from nannofossil Zone NP7/NP8 to NP12 (=CP6-CP10), thus covering an interval of time comprised between similar to 56.6 and similar to 52.2 Ma. Inferred sediment accumulation rates were relatively constant in the order of similar to 18 m/Myr, and were used to estimate the age of standard calcareous nannofossil events for comparison with, and improvements of, current time scales. We found several new and potentially useful biohorizons that help refining the chronology of this critical interval of time encompassing a long and biochronologically poorly known Chron C24r. We furthermore observed an apparent correlation between rock-magnetic properties of the sediments and global climate variability as revealed by a reference benthic delta O-18 record from the literature, whereby higher relative amounts of oxidized magnetic phases such as hematite and/or maghemite seem to correlate to extreme warm periods like the PETM at similar to 55 Ma and the early Eocene from similar to 54 to similar to 52.5 Ma. Mechanisms able to explain this apparent coupling between rock-magnetic variability and long-term global climate are presently under scrutiny. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available