4.7 Article

Influences on the fractionation of calcium isotopes in planktonic foraminifera

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 268, Issue 1-2, Pages 124-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.01.006

Keywords

calcium isotopes; planktonic foraminifera; paleotemperature; biomineralization; isotopic fractionation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For paleoceanographic studies, it is important to understand the processes that influence the calcium (Ca) isotopic composition of foraminiferal calcite tests preserved in the sediment record. Seven species of planktonic foraminifera from coretop sediments collectively exhibited a Ca temperature dependent fractionation of 0.013 parts per thousand per degrees C. This is in agreement with previously published estimates for most species of planktonic foraminifera as well as biogenic and inorganic calcite and aragonite. Four species of planktonic foraminifera collected from a sediment trap showed a considerable amount of scatter and no consistent temperature dependent fractionation. Analyzed size fractions of coretop samples show no significant relationship with delta Ca-44/40. However, preliminary results suggest that the symbiotic and spinose foraminifera Globigerinoides sacculifer might exhibit a relationship between test size and delta Ca-44/40. A one-box model in which Ca isotopes are allowed to fractionate by Rayleigh distillation from a biomineralization reservoir (internal pool) was used to constrain the isotopic composition of the original biomineralization Ca reservoir, assuming around 85% of the Ca reservoir is precipitated and the fractionation factor during precipitation is 0.9985 + 0.00002(T degrees C). To explain the foraminiferal Ca isotope data, this model indicates that the Ca isotopic composition of the biomineralization reservoir is offset from seawater (approximately -0.8 parts per thousand). (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available