4.7 Article

Lateral variations in CMB heat flux and deep mantle seismic velocity caused by a thermal-chemical-phase boundary layer in 3D spherical convection

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 271, Issue 1-4, Pages 348-358

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.013

Keywords

thermo-chemical mantle convection; 3D spherical shell; CMB heat flow; seismic anomalies; lateral heterogeneities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerical simulations of thermo-chemical, multi-phase, compressible mantle convection in a three-dimensional spherical shell are used to investigate the relationship between lateral variations in seismic shear-wave velocity V-s above the core-mantle boundary (CMB) and lateral variations in heat flux across the CMB (q(CMB)), when compositional variations and the post-perovskite phase transition are included. For simple thermal convection, the V-s-q(CMB) relationship is reasonably but not perfectly linear. The post-perovskite transition introduces a non-linearity that amplifies fast V-s anomalies in cold regions, but there is still a unique mapping between delta V-s and q(CMB). Lateral variations in composition such as piles of dense material introduce another non-linearity that affects hot upwelling regions, and introduces a non-uniqueness in delta V-s-q(CMB) if the dense material (e.g., MORB) is seismically fast compared to the surrounding material. In this case, dense piles are ringed by sharp, low-V-s anomalies. If the CMB is covered by a global dense layer than variations in delta V-s and q(CMB) are reduced but so is the mean value of q(CMB). In all cases, the peak-to-peak lateral variation in q(CMB) is similar to or larger than twice the mean value, which might create problems for generating a dynamo according to existing numerical dynamo simulations. Analytical scalings are developed to explain the observed trends. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available