4.5 Article

Electronic Circular Dichroism of Fluorescent Proteins: A Computational Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 119, Issue 8, Pages 3377-3386

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp511199g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Center [2012/05/B/ST4/01236]
  2. COST-CMTS Action COnvergent Distributed Environment for Computational Spectroscopy (CODECS) [CM1002]
  3. Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing
  4. Norwegian Supercomputing Program [NN4654K]
  5. University of Warsaw
  6. Research Council of Norway through a Centre of Excellence Grant [179568/V30]
  7. European Research Council [279619]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electronic circular dichroism (ECD) properties of the green fluorescent protein and other fluorescent proteins have been calculated with density functional theory. The influence of different embedding models on the ECD signal of the chromophore has been investigated by modeling the protein environment by the polarizable continuum model (QM/PCM), by the polarizable embedding model (PE-QM/MM), by treating the minimal environment quantum mechanically at the same footing as the chromophore (QM/QM), and by adding the remaining part of the protein by means of PCM (QM/QM/PCM). The rotatory strength is found to be more sensitive than the oscillatory strength to changes in the geometry of the chromophore and its surroundings and to the type of embedding model used. In general, explicit embedding of the surrounding protein (PE-QM/MM or QM/QM) induces an increase in the rotatory strength of the chromophore. Explicit inclusion of the whole protein through polarizable embedding is found to be an affordable embedding model that gives the correct sign of the rotatory strength for all fluorescent proteins. PCM is useful as a first approximation to protein environment effects, but as a rule seems to underestimate the rotatory strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available