4.3 Article

Does skin-to-skin contact reduce stress during diaper change in preterm infants?

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 169-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.01.011

Keywords

Skin-to-skin contact; Kangaroo Mother Care; Diaper change; Stress; Preterm infant; Routine care giving tasks; NICU

Funding

  1. Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Skin-to-skin contact reduces pain response in preterm infants subjected to minor painful procedures, such as heel lance. Diaper change is a procedure performed several times daily in hospitalized preterm infants. Routine care giving tasks such as diaper change may be stressful for the infant. Aims: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether diaper change induces stress and if skin-to-skin contact could reduce such stress, measured by changes in skin conductance. Study design: This was a randomized crossover pilot study in 19 preterm infants with gestational age between 28 and 34 weeks. The diaper change procedure was done twice in each infant, once during skin-to-skin contact, and once in incubator or bed with the mother present. Outcome measures: During diaper change heart rate (HR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), and changes in skin conductance (SC) peaks per sec, using the Skin Conductance Algesimeter (SCA), were registered. Results: The mean SC peaks/sec increased/decreased significantly under/after change of diapers which thereby underpins that this is a stressful procedure for the preterm infant. Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) entails significantly lower stress levels (p < 0.05) compared to diaper changed in an incubator/bed measured by the SCA. Conclusions: Diaper change is a stressful procedure for preterm infants and may be ameliorated by skin-to-skin contact. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available