4.3 Article

Neonatal outcome of preterm infants born to mothers with abnormal genital tract colonisation and chorioamnionitis: A cohort study

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages 271-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.10.003

Keywords

Intrauterine infection; Chorioamnionitis; Foetus; Colonisation; Preterm delivery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We hypothesised that abnormal genital tract colonisation leading to an in utero inflammation/infection process, contributes to the risk of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), intra ventricular haemorrhage (IVH), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants. Methods: 396 placentas and umbilical cords of neonates born at 22-32 weeks of gestation were evaluated. Genital tract and amniotic fluid swabs were cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Results: Chorioamnionitis significantly increases the risk for RDS (OR 1.74, 95% Cl 1.14-2.65), NEC (OR 3.22, 95% Cl 1.36-3.28) and ROP > 2 (OR 2.12, 95% Cl 1.33-3.36). But the risk for IVH, PDA and BPD did not differ between the groups. Klebsiella pneumoniae (OR 5.33, 95% CI 1.06-26.79), Staphylococcus sp. (OR 18.39, 95% Cl 2.32-145.2) and Enterococcus faecalis (OR 10.7, 95% Cl 1.27-89.9) showed a significant relationship with intrauterine inflammation processes. E. faecalis increased the risk for NEC (OR 6.13, 95% CI 1.059-37.6). We did not note a link between ROP and genital tract colonisation. Interestingly PDA seems to be triggered by the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR 238 95% Cl 1.83-3.82). Conclusion: Our results show a link between K. pneumoniae, Staphylococcus sp., E. faecalis and intrauterine infection. E. faecalis increases the risk for NEC, and suggests a direct link between gram + bacteria, chorioamnionitis and NEC. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available