4.3 Article

The role of plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in predicting the severity of transient tachypnea of the newborn

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages 315-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.08.026

Keywords

Respiratory distress; Natriuretic peptides; Newborn; Transient tachypnea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aim: Transient tachypnea of the newborn (UN) is a consequence of inadequate neonatal lung fluid clearance. Natriuretic peptides play an important role in the regulation of extracellular fluid volume. The aim of the study was to investigate the relation between plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and ITN, and to find out its role in predicting disease severity. Methods: A prospective controlled study involving 67 infants with TTN and 33 controls >= 34 weeks gestational age was conducted. Study and control groups were compared for plasma NT-proBNP levels measured on the 6th, 24th, 72nd and 120th hours of life. Cardiac systolic functions were evaluated by echocardiography. Results: NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in neonates with UN compared to controls at 6th, 24th, 72nd and 120th hours (p <0.001). NT-proBNP levels at 24th and 72nd hours were significantly higher in infants with prolonged tachypnea (p = 0.007 and p = 0.03) and in those who required respiratory support (p = 0.006 and p<0.001). Tachypnea duration was correlated with NT-proBNP levels at 24 h (r = 0.41, p = 0.001). At a cut-off value of 6575 pg/ml, NT-proBNP had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 64% to predict mechanical ventilation requirement. Cardiac systolic functions were normal in all TTN patients. Conclusion: Plasma NT-proBNP levels are increased in neonates with TTN. Measurement of plasma NT-proBNP can be useful for predicting infants who will have prolonged tachypnea and mechanical ventilation requirement. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available