4.3 Article

A randomized trial of DHA intake during infancy: School readiness and receptive vocabulary at 2-3.5 years of age

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 88, Issue 11, Pages 885-891

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.07.007

Keywords

Docosahexaenoic acid; Infant; Cognitive development; School readiness; Vocabulary

Funding

  1. Mead Johnson Nutrition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Studies investigating the effects of docosahexaenoic acid (DNA) in infant formula on language development yield conflicting results. No study to date has investigated the effects of DHA in infant formula on school readiness. Aim: To determine the effects of different dietary concentrations of DNA provided during the first 12 months of life on language development and school readiness. Design: This was a double-masked, randomized, controlled, prospective trial. A total of 182 infants were enrolled at 1-9 days of age and assigned randomly to receive infant formula with one of four levels of DHA: control (0% DNA), 0.32% DNA, 0.64% DHA, or 0.96% DHA. All formulas with DHA also contained 0.64% arachidonic acid. One hundred forty-one children completed the 12-month feeding trial and were eligible for this study. Consent was obtained from 131 participants. School readiness was assessed at 2.5 years using the Bracken Basic Concept Scale-Revised (BBCS-R) and receptive vocabulary was assessed at 2 and 3.5 years using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition (PPVT-III). Results: There were no diet group differences on any of the BBCS-R subscales. On the PPVT-III, the control group had higher raw scores and standard scores than both the 0.32% and 0.96% groups at 2 years of age. These differences were not evident at 3.5 years. Conclusions: Dietary DHA during the first year of life did not enhance school readiness or language development. Children who consumed infant formula with 0.32% and 0.96% DHA showed lower receptive vocabulary scores than controls at 2 but not 3.5 years of age. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available