4.3 Article

Outcome of extremely low birth weight infants: What's new in the third millennium? Neuropsychological profiles at four years

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 241-250

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.08.012

Keywords

Extremely low birth weight infants; Preterm infants; Cognitive outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, even those not presenting severe neuromotor sequelae, continue to be at risk of developing multiple, complex disorders involving the cognitive, emotional and behavioural domains. Follow-up protocols are able, in the short term, to identify subjects at risk of developing major sequelae, however they fail to identify all children at risk of developing disorders. Aims: To investigate the cognitive, neuropsychological and behavioural outcomes of a sample of ELBW children at the age of four years in order to identify characteristic profiles. Study design: Longitudinal study. Subjects: 16 healthy ELBW children born in 2005 and followed up until the age of four. Outcome measure: Performances on standardised tests evaluating intelligence, memory, cognitive visual functions, attention, and executive functions. Results: General intelligence was within normal range. Cognitive profile showed mild or moderate deficits with different levels of involvement in many of the examined functions, in particular executive functions, attention and naming. Conclusion: There emerged a wide-ranging spectrum of weaknesses and deficits involving all the functions examined, which together give rise to a dysexecutive syndrome. Analysis of cognitive profiles showed that the sample could be divided into two subgroups of subjects that differ in the quality of their global cognitive and behavioural functioning. Our results confirm the need to continue follow up of ELBW children until school age, as this will allow early detection of at-risk children and the planning of timely preventive interventions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available