4.3 Article

Measuring preterm cumulative stressors within the NICU: The neonatal infant stressor scale

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 85, Issue 9, Pages 549-555

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.05.002

Keywords

Stress; Preterm birth; Child development; Medical care research; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Stress experiences, while pervasive, are less likely than painful experiences to be managed in still-hospitalised preterm infants. Aim: We aimed to quantify the severity of common stressors for preterm infants with a view to providing a tool to manage presumed accumulated infant stress. Methods and subjects: Seventeen doctors and 130 nurses who work in Neonatal Intensive and Special Care Nurseries rated the perceived stress severity of 44 acute events and 24 chronic living conditions for preterm infants at three ages (< 28 weeks, 28-32 weeks, > 32 weeks post-conceptional age) and for themselves. Acute items (such as heel lance) were organised into nursing, peripheral venous access. peripheral arterial access, central vascular access, ventilation, nutrition, medical procedures, surgery, radiology and miscellaneous categories. Chronic living conditions included items such as receiving intranasal oxygen and having a systemic infection. Results: Doctors and nurses perceived nearly all items to be stressful to infants to some degree and to be equally stressful across ages. The degree of stress experienced by clinicians themselves was generally low and moderately correlated with presumed infant stress for the same items. Presumed infant stress was inversely related to clinician age. Conclusion: Based on these results we developed the Neonatal Infant Stressor Scale to help track, measure and manage presumed accumulated stress in preterm neonates. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available