4.3 Article

Does gestational duration within the normal range predict infant neuromotor development?

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 84, Issue 10, Pages 659-665

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.04.007

Keywords

Gestational duration; Birth weight; Neurodevelopment; Infant development; Cohort study

Funding

  1. Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam
  2. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (Zon Mw)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To examine the extent to which infant neuromotor development is determined by gestational duration and birth weight within the normal range. Methods: The study was embedded within the Generation R Study, a population-based cohort in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. An adapted version of Touwen's Neurodevelopmentat Examination was used to assess 3224 infants (1576 mates and 1648 females) at corrected ages between 9 and 15 weeks. Non-optimal neuromotor development was defined as a score in the highest tertile. Results: Infant neuromotor development was significantly affected by gestational duration (odds ratio 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.7;0.8). Adding a quadratic term of gestational duration to the model revealed a highly significant curvilinear association between gestational duration and neuromotor development; after adjusting for post-conceptional age this was stilt significant. Although babies with a 1 kg lower birth weight had a 30% higher risk of non-optimal neuromotor development, this association disappeared after adjustment for post-conceptionat age. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that differences in infant neuromotor development can be explained even by variations in gestational duration within the normal range. If an infant is found to have minor neuromotor delays, account should be taken of this. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available