4.5 Article

The Effect of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Adults

Journal

EAR AND HEARING
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 600-610

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000028

Keywords

Aging; Cognition; Hearing Aids; Hearing Loss; Listening effort; Noise-Reduction Algorithm

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30 HD-002528]
  2. Center for Biobehavioral Neurosciences in Communication Disorders [P30 DC-005803]
  3. [RO1 AG025906]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a noise-reduction (NR) algorithm on the listening effort hearing-impaired participants expend on a speech in noise task. Design: Twelve hearing-impaired listeners fitted with behind-the-ear hearing aids with a fast-acting modulation-based NR algorithm participated in this study. A dual-task paradigm was used to measure listening effort with and without the NR enabled in the hearing aid. The primary task was a sentence-in-noise task presented at fixed overall speech performance levels of 76% (moderate listening condition) and 50% (difficult listening condition) correct performance, and the secondary task was a visual-tracking test. Participants also completed measures of working memory (Reading Span test), and processing speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test) ability. Results: Participants' speech recognition in noise scores did not significantly change with the NR algorithm activated in the hearing aid in either listening condition. The NR algorithm significantly decreased listening effort, but only in the more difficult listening condition. Last, there was a tendency for participants with faster processing speeds to expend less listening effort with the NR algorithm when listening to speech in background noise in the difficult listening condition. Conclusions: The NR algorithm reduced the listening effort adults with hearing loss must expend to understand speech in noise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available