4.3 Article

Cricopharyngeal Dilatation for the Long-term Treatment of Dysphagia in Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy

Journal

DYSPHAGIA
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 216-220

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-011-9356-y

Keywords

Dysphagia; Muscular dystrophy; Oesophageal dilatation; OPMD; Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy; Deglutition; Deglutition disorders

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) is a rare autosomal dominant, progressive degenerative muscle disorder featuring dysphagia with limited therapeutic options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeated endoscopic dilatation for OPMD over a 15-year period. All patients seen at our Regional Swallowing Clinic with OPMD confirmed by genetic analysis were included. Cricopharyngeal dilatation was performed as an outpatient procedure using a wire-guided 18-mm (54 Fr) Savary-Gilliard bougie with the patient under sedation. Patients were offered repeat endoscopic dilatation when symptoms recurred. Symptom severity prior to initial dilatation and at follow-up was evaluated using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ). Nine patients (7 female, 2 male) were included for analysis. Median total treatment period was 13 years (range = 3-15), median number of dilatations per patient was 7.2 (range = 1-16), and median interval between treatments was 15 months (range = 4.5-45). All patients recorded sustained symptom improvement. Mean SSQ score (out of 1,700) was 1,108.11 (SD +/- A 272.85) prior to first dilatation and 297.78 (SD +/- A 189.14) at last follow-up, representing a 73% decrease (95% CI = 52-94) in degree of dysphagia symptoms (paired -test, = 0.0001). All mean scores for individual questions also showed significant improvement ( < 0.05). No adverse events were reported with all patients maintaining oral feeding at last follow-up. Repeated cricopharyngeal dilatation is a safe, effective, well-tolerated, and long-lasting treatment for dysphagia in OPMD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available