4.5 Article

A Stepping Stone Approach for Obtaining Quantum Free Energies of Hydration

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 119, Issue 23, Pages 7030-7040

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b01625

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim (BBSRC grant) [BB/I015922/1]
  2. BBSRC
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1094769, BB/K016601/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J015059/1, EP/J010588/1, EP/M022609/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/K016601/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. EPSRC [EP/J010588/1, EP/M022609/1, EP/J015059/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a method which uses DFT (quantum, QM) calculations to improve free energies of binding computed with classical fore fields (classical; MM). To overcome the incomplete overlap of configurational spaces between MM and QM, we use a hybrid Monte Carlo approach to generate quickly correct ensembles of structures of intermediate states between a MM and a QM/MM description, hence taking into account a great fraction, of the electronic polarization,of the quantum system, while being able to use thermodynamic integration to compute the free energy of transition between the MM and QM/MM. Then, we perform a final transition from QM/MM, to full QM using a one-step, free energy perturbation approach. By using QM/MM as a stepping stone toward the full QM description, we find very small convergence errors (<1 kJ/mol) in the transition to full QM. We apply this method to compute hydration free energies, and we obtain consistent improvements over the. MM values for all molecules we used in this study. This approach requires large-scale DFT calculations as the full QM systems involved the ligands and all waters in their simulation cells, so the linear-scaling DFT code ONETEP was used for these calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available