4.5 Article

Energy Thresholds of DNA Damage Induced by UV Radiation: An XPS Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 119, Issue 17, Pages 5404-5411

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b01439

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (Portugal)
  3. Portuguese research Grant [PEst-OE/FIS/UI0068/2011, PEst-OE/CTM/LA0024/2013]
  4. [SFRH/BD/35954/2007]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/35954/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work stresses on damage at the molecular level caused, by ultraviolet radiation (UV) in the range from 3.5 to 8 eV, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) films observed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Detailed quantitative XPS analysis, in which all the amounts are relative to sodium assumed not to be released from the samples, of the carbon, :oxygen, and particularly, nitrogen components, reveals that irradiation leads to sugar degradation with CO-based compounds release for energies above 6.9 eV and decrease of nitrogen groups which are not invoked in hydrogen bonding at energies above 4.2 eV. Also the phosphate groups are seen to decrease to energies above 4.2 eV. Analysis of XPS spectra allowed to conclude that the damage on bases peripheral nitrogen atoms are following the,damage on phosphates. It suggests that very low kinetic energy photoelectrons are ejected from the DNA bases, as a result of UV light induced breaking of the phosphate ester groups which forms a transient anion with resonance formation and whereby mist of the nitrogen DNA peripheral:groups, are :removed. The degree of ionization of DNA was observed to increase with radiation energy; indicating that the ionized phosphate groups are kept unchanged. This result was interpreted by the shielding of-phosphate groups caused by water molecules hydration near sodium atoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available