4.5 Article

Prediction of Physicochemical Properties of Raspberry Dried by Microwave-Assisted Fluidized Bed Dryer Using Artificial Neural Network

Journal

DRYING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 4-12

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2013.801849

Keywords

ANN modeling; Fluidized bed dryer; Microwave; Quality parameters; Raspberries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main target of this research is to dry raspberries in a microwave-assisted fluidized bed dryer. Artificial neural network (ANN) modeling was used in order to evaluate and predict the physicochemical properties of this fruit. In this research, the effects of five variablesmicrowave power (0, 300, and 600W), temperature (55, 70, and 85 degrees C), air flow rate (15, 20, and 25m/s), starting time of microwave input (from the moment when the moisture content decreased until 334, 400, and 466g water/g dry matter), and amount of loaded material (50, 100, and 150g)on nine outputsdrying time, rehydration capacity, density, porosity, hardness, water activity, phenolic compounds content, anthocyanins content, and the antioxidant activity of dried raspberrieswere studied. A feed-forward multilayered perceptron trained by back-propagation algorithms for five independent variables was developed to predict these nine outputs. The optimal configuration of the neural network model had a hidden layer with nine neurons. The predictive ability of the ANN was compared using a separate data set of 52 unseen experiments based on root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R-2) for each output parameter. The optimum model was able to predict the nine output parameters with a coefficient of determination higher than 0.92. The results indicated that the experimental and ANN-predicted data sets were in good agreement, so it is feasible to use an ANN to predict the physicochemical properties of dried black raspberry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available