4.5 Article

Spray Drying and Process Optimization of Unclarified Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Juice

Journal

DRYING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 787-798

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2012.663434

Keywords

Maltodextrin; Optimization; Pomegranate juice; Pomegranate juice powder; Spray drying

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [109O456]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, production of pomegranate juice powder using a spray dryer was investigated. To prevent stickiness, maltodextrin dextrose equivalent 6 (DE6) was used as a drying agent. While feed flow rate, feed temperature, and air flow rate were kept constant, air inlet temperature (110-140 degrees C), percentage maltodextrin (MD; maltodextrin dry solids/100 g feed mixture dry solids; 39.08-64.12%), and feed mixture concentration (19.61-44.11 degrees Brix) were chosen as the independent variables. Product properties investigated included moisture content, hygroscopicity, anthocyanin content, color change, solubility, bulk density, total phenolics content, antioxidant capacity, and sensory properties. The products were produced with high yield (86%) and high antioxidant activity (77%). MD and drying temperature were found to be the most important variables in production of pomegranate juice powders. Because total color change (Delta E), bulk density, antioxidant capacity, and powder yield were affected strongly by the independent variables, these parameters were used in optimization of the process. The optimum temperature, feed mixture concentration, and percentage maltodextrin were 100 degrees C, 30.8 degrees Brix, and 53.5% MD, respectively. This study revealed that by applying these optimal conditions, pomegranate juice powder with a 55% dry solids yield, 9.78 total color change, 0.35 g/mL bulk density, and 57.8% antioxidant capacity were produced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available