4.4 Article

Determination of pethidine hydrochloride using potentiometric coated graphite and carbon paste electrodes

Journal

DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 213-221

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dta.287

Keywords

potentiometry; carbon paste electrode; pethidine; analyzed sample; coated wire electrode

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new approach for lowering the detection limit of a pethidine ion-selective electrode is presented. A coated graphite (CGE) and carbon paste (CPE) electrodes for pethidine ions based on pethidine-phosphotungstate (PD-PT) as ion-pair complex are described. The sensors exhibit a Nernstian slope of 58.1 and 54.2 mVdecade1 for pethidine ion over a wide concentration range from 2.6 x 107 to 1.0 x 102 M and 2.1 x 106 to 1.0 x 102 M with a detection limit of 1.8 x 107 M and 7.3 x 107 M for pethidine coated graphite (PD-CGE) and pethidine carbon paste electrode (PD-CPE), respectively. These sensors exhibited a fast response time (about 58 s) and good stability. The standard electrode potentials, Eo, were determined at different temperatures and used to calculate the isothermal temperature coefficient (dEo/dT) of the PD-CGE and PD-CPE, which was 0.0062 and 0.0071 V/ degrees C, respectively. Selectivity coefficients, determined by matched potential method (MPM) and separate solution method (SSM), showed high selectivity for pethidine hydrochloride (PDCl) over a large number of inorganic cations, organic cations, sugars, urine components, and some common drug excipients. The sensors were applied for determination of PDCl in ampoule and in spiked urine samples using potentiometric determination, standard addition and the calibration curve methods. The results obtained were satisfactory with excellent percentage recovery comparable and sometimes better than those obtained by other routine methods for the assay. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available