3.8 Article

EUCAST BREAKPOINTS FOR ANTIFUNGALS

Journal

DRUG NEWS & PERSPECTIVES
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 93-97

Publisher

PROUS SCIENCE, SAU-THOMSON REUTERS
DOI: 10.1358/dnp.2010.23.2.1400855

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pfizer
  2. Gilead Sciences
  3. Merck Sharp Dohme
  4. Schering-Plough
  5. Astellas
  6. Merck
  7. Astellas Pharma
  8. BioMerieux
  9. Soria Melguizo SA
  10. European Union
  11. ALBAN
  12. Spanish Agency for International Cooperation
  13. Spanish Ministry of Culture and Education
  14. Spanish Health Research Fund
  15. Institut de Salud Carlos III
  16. Ramon Areces Foundation
  17. Mutua Madrilefia Foundation
  18. AM-Pharma
  19. Basilea Pharmaceutica
  20. Merck Sharpe Dohme
  21. UCB Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Susceptibility testing of fungi and development of interpretative breakpoints has become increasingly important due to the growing incidence of invasive fungal infections, the number and classes of antifungals, and the emerging reports of acquired resistance. The subcommittee on antifungal susceptibility testing of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) has developed standards for susceptibility testing of fermentative yeasts and molds as well as proposing breakpoints for fluconazole and voriconazote against Candida. The aim of this work is to describe the EUCAST process of setting breakpoints for antifungals. Five aspects are evaluated during the process of developing breakpoints: 1) the most common dosage used in each European country, 2) the definition of the wild-type population for each target microorganism at the species level and the determination of epidemiological cutoffs, 3) the drug's pharmacokinetics and 4) pharmacodynamics, including Monte Carlo simulations, and 5) the correlation of MICs with clinical outcome of patients treated with the compound. When insufficient data are available (e.g., due to lack of information on the clinical outcome of infections caused by isolates with an elevated MIC), epidemiological cutoff values, rather than breakpoints, are recommended until the necessary information becomes available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available