4.4 Review

Porcine brain microvessel endothelial cells show pro-inflammatory response to the size and composition of metallic nanoparticles

Journal

DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 224-231

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/03602532.2013.873450

Keywords

Blood-brain barrier; lipopolysaccharide (LPS); metallic-colloidal nanoparticles; neuroinflamation; neurotoxicity; porcine brain microvessel endothelial cells

Funding

  1. Intramural FDA HHS [FD999999] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the current studies was to determine if systemic exposure of various metallic nanoparticles differing in size and composition [silver (Ag-NPs, 25, 40 and 80 nm), copper-oxide (Cu-NPs, 40 and 60 nm) or gold (Au-NPs, 3 and 5 nm)] can induce the release of pro-inflammatory mediators that influence the restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in vitro. Confluent porcine brain microvessel endothelial cells (pBMECs) (8-12 days) were treated with various metallic nanoparticles (15 mg/ml). Extracellular concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators (IL-1 beta, TNF alpha and PGE(2)) were evaluated using ELISA. pBMECs were cultured in standard 12-well Transwell (R) inserts, and permeability was evaluated by measuring the transport of fluorescein across the pBMEC monolayers. PGE(2) release following Cu-NP exposure was significantly increased when compared to the control. Similar results were observed for Ag-NPs but not Au-NPs. The secretion of TNF alpha and IL-1 beta was observed for both Cu-NPs and Ag-NPs but not in response to Au-NPs. The post-treatment time profiles of TNF alpha and IL-1 beta revealed that the IL-1 beta response was more persistent. The permeability ratios (exposure/control) were significantly greater following exposure to Cu-NPs or Ag-NPs, compared to Au-NPs. Together, these data suggest that the composition and size of NPs can cause significant pro-inflammatory response that can influence the integrity of the BBB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available