4.1 Article

Functional Characterization of Human Aquaporin 9 as a Facilitative Glycerol Carrier

Journal

DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 279-284

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC STUDY XENOBIOTICS
DOI: 10.2133/dmpk.23.279

Keywords

aquaporin 9; carrier; facilitative transport; glycerol; liver; oocyte expression system

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Hoh-ansha Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism of glycerol transport by human aquaporin 9 (hAQP9), which is a liver-specific AQP water channel and can also transport glycerol, was investigated by using the Xenopus laevis oocyte expression system. It was found that specific glycerol uptake by hAQP9 was concentration-dependent (saturable) at 25 degrees C, conforming to the Michaelis-Menten kinetics with the maximum transport rate (J(max)) of 0.84 pmol/min/oocyte and the Michaelis constant (K-m) of 9.2 mu M, and temperature-dependent, being reduced by about 70% when temperature was lowered from 25 degrees C to 4 degrees C. Such dependences on concentration and temperature are characteristic of a carrier-mediated type of mechanism rather than a channel type, which is expected not to depend on them. Furthermore, several glycerol-related compounds, such as monoacetin, were found to specifically inhibit hAQP9-mediated glycerol uptake, indicating a possibility of competition with glycerol. hAQP9-mediated glycerol uptake was, however, found not to require Na+. All these results suggest that hAQP9 functions as a facilitative carrier for glycerol, although it had been believed to function as a channel. Findings in the present study provide novel insight into its glycerol-transporting mechanism and would help exploring a possibility that hAQP9 inhibitors might help lower blood glucose level by reducing gluconeogenesis by limiting hepatic glycerol uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available